FOR SENIORS...IOP INFO

IB A1 Oral Presentation Rubric


Name:

A. KNOWLEDGE AND CONTENT OF WORKS:

How well does the candidate know and understand the content of the work(s)'' How well does the candidate situate the work(s) within the context of the larger work from which it has been taken or the body of works t> which it belongs?



Content of the Work(s)

 (1) little knowledge or understanding

 (2) some knowledge but superficial understanding

 (3) adequate knowledge and understanding

 (4) good knowledge and understanding

 (5) thorough knowledge and understanding



Appropriate Context 

(1) little knowledge  (2) some knowledge  (3) adequate knowledge  (4) good knowledge  (5) precise knowledge

/5

B. Interpretation and Personal Response How valid is the candidate's interpretation of the work(s)?

How well has the candidate identified and analyzed the effects of literary feature in the wok(s), such as diction, imagery, tone, structure, style, and technique?

To what extent does the candidate's response show critical thinking and originality? How precise and relevant are the candidate's references to the works)?





Awareness of Literary Features

 (1-2) little

 (3-4) some

 (5-6) adequate; some analysis

of their effects (7-8) good; detailed analysis of

their effects  (9-10) excellent; critical analysis

of their effects

Support/References to the Work

(1-2) none

 (3-4) supported by some

references  (5-6) generally supported by

relevant references D (7-8) supported by relevant

references  (9-10) fully supported by precise

references

Interpretation

(1-2) little; response consists mainly of

plot summary

(3-4) some; some elements of relevant

personal response, w/a

(5-6) generally valid and accurate; some

degree of critical personal response, where

appropriate (w/a)

(7-8) valid and generally detailed; a

considered critical response, w/a O (9-10) convincing and detailed; a fully

considered and independent critical

response, w/a



/10

C. Presentation How structured is the candidate's response? How effective and convincing is the candidate's presentation? How appropriately does the candidate integrate supporting references to the work(s)?



Structure

 (1-2) little evidence

 (3-4) some evidence

 (5-6) adequate

 (7-8) clear and logical

 (9-10) purposeful and

effective



Coherence of Presentation  (1-2) little attempt toward coherence and focus  (3-4) some attempt coherence; not always focused  (5-6) generally focused; presented in coherent,

efffective manner  (7-8) focused; presented in clear, coherent,

effective, convincing manner  (9-10) focused, coherent; presented in very

effective, persuasive manner



Integration of Supporting References

 (1-2) few references to work(s)

(3-4) not appropriately integrated into

presentation  (5-6) sometimes appropriately

integrated

(7-8) appropriately integrated  (9-10) well integrated



/10

D. Use Of Language How accurate, dear, and precise is the language used by the candidate? How appropriate is the candidate's choice of register end style for the occasion?



Speech/Expression

(1) not readily comprehensible; many

lapses in grammar

 (2) some clarity and coherence;

some degree of grammatical

accuracy  (3) clear, appropriate to occasion; a

few lapses in grammar  (4) clear, varied, precise, appropriate;

no significant lapses in grammar  (5) clear, varied, precise, concise,

appropriate; no significant lapses

in grammar



Register/Style

 (1-2) no recognizable attempt  (3) attempt to use appropriate

register  (4) appropriate register and

style  (5) effective choice of register

and style





Vocabulary

 (1) rarely accurate/appropriate  (2-3) sometimes appropriate for

literary discussion  (4) some literary terms used

appropriately  (5) precise use of wide vocabulary;

literary terms used appropriately